Gazidis still enslaved by Wenger’s despotism


The AST held its annual meeting with Ivan Gazidis on Wednesday evening, and it’s up on Arsenal.con for you to watch at your behest.

Ivan was more charming this year, a little more forthright – but at the same time only the most naïve of supporters would fall for his tactic of answering questions at ridiculous length simply to reduce the amount of time available for spontaneous communications from the floor.

Pre-empting the distaste of all but the most boot-licking of Arsenal supporters, the American blathered at length about UEFA’s FFP (Financial Fair Play) model, continuing to infer that Arsenal cannot compete with the ‘big clubs’ under its current self-sustainability model until FFP is implemented.

At events like this, it’s almost as if Wenger is operating Gazidis’ mouth from behind a screen – especially when it comes to “waiting for FFP”, which has Wenger’s fingers all over it – a manipulative excuse designed to mask his own faltering performance as manager and allow him endless more years of fumbling.

This inference that FFP will be implemented effectively seems a tad naïve to me. UEFA, incompetent at the best of times, can’t even control racist supporters in a tin pot footballing nation like Ukraine, so how will it control the massive complexities of FFP – with clubs no doubt using every legal resource to extricate themselves from the regulations to gain advantage?

Besides, do you really think UEFA will throw clubs like Man City and Chelsea to the wall, missing out on the huge revenues they supply and feeding the risk of ostracising said clubs into forming a dreaded European super league?

So the plan is laid out – wait for FFP, with Gazidis putting all of Arsenal’s failures down to lack of cash and zero examination of the performance of Arsene Wenger and whether he is tactically culpable, able to motivate, capable enough as a defensive coach or a myriad of other performance-related failures that you can squarely attribute to Wenger’s obstinate, blind-sighted management.

The subject of Usmanov, and what he could bring to the table, was also broached, but it seems more obvious than ever that Stan Kroenke does not want the Russian to play any part in the running of the club and never will. Kroenke’s sitting on a financial goldmine, so why invite Usmanov to interfere with that?

Overall, my residing feeling is that Gazidis is pretty much a slave to Kroenke’s business objectives and his over-amplified admiration of Arsene Wenger. Overpaid and sitting pretty, Gazidis may care about Arsenal, but certainly not enough to put his own job on the line. He could yet flourish as a CEO if he flexed his muscles, but currently remains intimidated by Wenger’s manipulative sense of self-importance.

At the end of the day, Gazidis IS doing everything in his power to make Arsenal more financially competitive within the restrictions placed on him and his fairytale belief in FFP - injected into his brain by Wenger like some monkey serum, but until Gazidis has the courage to think independently and demand a lot more from the manager in terms of making Arsenal a truly competitive team (and 100% accountable for failing to deliver), Arsenal will remain the upper tier zombie club that it is. 


Insults directed at the site author or any other contributor will result in you being blocked from accessing this website indefinitely.


AST backs AT wage bill figures/5Live discussion

On Tuesday, there was a Radio 5Live Arsenal Special with a panel discussing Arsenal’s recently announced half-year results and the peformance of the club and manager. Some of it (not all of it) is damning, but makes for interesting listening.

Chaired by Mark Pougatch, the panel includes: Christian Purslow (former Liverpool Managing Director), Nigel Phillips (Arsenal Supporters Trust), Martin Keown and Jeremy Wilson (Daily Telegraph).

Key stats to take from Arsenal’s half-year figures are:

  • The club is profitable at every level
  • Half-year results show that full-year profit is expected to be in the region of £45m
  • Stadium debt is no real burden to the club; the cost is £20m pa and the club generates £50m
  • Arsenal is sitting on significant cash resources of £115m; so why didn’t Wenger spend some in January?
  • The stadium is already half paid for (not including cash reserves)
  • There’s still £30m to come from property sales
  • The wage bill is now approaching £140m – 90% of which comprises of player/staff wages
  • Ticket prices are now amongst the highest in the world, with Club Level tickets rising another 2% next season

Other interesting speculations:

Arsenal blew £75m on players + agents fees in the summer, Spurs spent £8m.

Lower and mid-range players at Arsenal are paid significantly more than at Man Utd, Man City or Chelsea. Keown called the amount of money young players are paid as “staggering”.

Because of the wage equality, not inequality, Van Persie is paid way below his competitive market value in salary terms. Arsenal risk losing him because his salary is being kept down by the average of the others.

At Manchester United, young players such as Ravel Morrison, Federico Macheda and Paul Pogba have failed to agree new contracts. Ferguson is refusing to put them on salaries that would still be 50% less than what Wenger pays his kids.

Arsenal could attract a better class of player if the lower-to-mid-range players were not so handsomely rewarded.

Arsenal players out on loan are currently unsalable because of their high wages.

With the guests reading directly from the wage bill figures published by Arsenal Truth on Feb 23, the AST’s Nigel Phillips admitted the figures were a good guesstimate. Radio 5 tried to speak to Gazidis about the figures, but he refused

The panel does also defend Wenger; it’s not all one-way traffic.

Click here to listen to the hour-long programme (starts at around the 6-minute mark).


Insults directed at the site author or any other contributor will result in you being blocked from accessing this website indefinitely.


Arsenal's £130m wage bill exposed

With some outside assistance I've been able to cobble together an estimate of what Arsenal's current wage bill comprises of. 

Naturally, without access to the books, there is a (large) element of guesswork here. For example - despite the obscene wages in some (most) instances, I found that £15m was still unaccounted for, so had to put that amount down as "OTHER STAFF". Remember there are scouts to pay and probably a few hundred other individuals apart from the playing and coaching staff that draw a salary at the Emirates.

Take a look dear reader, you may find it illuminating.

FIRST TEAM WAGE (pw/k) WAGE (p/yr)
Robin van Persie £90,000 £4,680,000
Andrey Arshavin £80,000 £4,160,000
Mikel Arteta £70,000 £3,640,000
Theo Walcott £70,000 £3,640,000
Thomas Vermaelen £70,000 £3,640,000
Yossi Benayoun £70,000 £3,640,000
Gervinho £70,000 £3,640,000
Manuel Almunia £60,000 £3,120,000
Per Mertesacker £60,000 £3,120,000
Sebastien Squillaci £60,000 £3,120,000
Tomas Rosicky £60,000 £3,120,000
Bacary Sagna £60,000 £3,120,000
Aaron Ramsey £55,000 £2,860,000
Alex Song £55,000 £2,860,000
Jack Wilshere £55,000 £2,860,000
Nicklas Bendtner £52,000 £2,704,000
Marouane Chamakh £50,000 £2,600,000
Abou Diaby £50,000 £2,600,000
Andre Santos £50,000 £2,600,000
Carlos Vela £50,000 £2,600,000
Denilson £50,000 £2,600,000
Johan Djourou £50,000 £2,600,000
Laurent Koscielny £50,000 £2,600,000
Lukasz Fabianski £40,000 £2,080,000
Wojciech Szczesny £40,000 £2,080,000
Armand Traore £40,000 £2,080,000
Ju Young Park £40,000 £2,080,000
Kieran Gibbs £40,000 £2,080,000
Vito Mannone £20,000 £1,040,000
Alex Oxlade-Chamberlain £20,000 £1,040,000
Carl Jenkinson £20,000 £1,040,000
Emmanuel Frimpong £20,000 £1,040,000
Ryo £20,000 £1,040,000
Francis Coquelin £15,000 £780,000
Henri Lansbury £5,000 £260,000
Ignasi Miquel £5,000 £260,000
Zak Ansah £1,000 £52,000
Daniel Boateng £1,000 £52,000
George Brislen-Hall £1,000 £52,000
Craig Eastmond £1,000 £52,000
Benik Afobe £1,000 £52,000
Chuks Aneke £1,000 £52,000
Sead Hajrovic £1,000 £52,000
Conor Henderson £1,000 £52,000
Gavin Hoyte £1,000 £52,000
Sean McDermott £1,000 £52,000
Jernade Meade £1,000 £52,000
Rhys Murphy £1,000 £52,000
Nigel Neita £1,000 £52,000
Oguzhan Ozyakup £1,000 £52,000
Sanchez Watt £1,000 £52,000
Icholas Yennaris £1,000 £52,000
Martin Angha £1,000 £52,000
Kyle Ebecilio £1,000 £52,000
Damian Martinez £1,000 £52,000
Elton Monteiro £1,000 £52,000
Jordan Wynter £1,000 £52,000
Jeffrey Monakana £1,000 £52,000
James Campbell £1,000 £52,000
Samir Bihmoutine £1,000 £52,000
Philip Roberts £1,000 £52,000
Ben Glasgow £1,000 £52,000
Reice Charles-Cook £1,000 £52,000
Alban Bunjaku £1,000 £52,000
Isaac Hayden £1,000 £52,000
Zachari Fagan £1,000 £52,000
Jon Toral £1,000 £52,000
Anthony Jeffrey £1,000 £52,000
Serge Gnabry £1,000 £52,000
Hector Bellerin £1,000 £52,000
Kristoffer Olsso £1,000 £52,000
Kyle Bartley £1,000 £52,000
Wellington £1,000 £52,000
James Shea £1,000 £52,000
Pedro Botelho £1,000 £52,000
Samuel Galindo £1,000 £52,000
Arsène Wenger £135,000 £7,020,000
Pat Rice £30,000 £1,560,000
Boro Primorac £30,000 £1,560,000
Gerry Peyton £10,000 £520,000
Neil Banfield £10,000 £520,000
Tony Colbert £10,000 £520,000
Colin Lewin £10,000 £520,000
Gary O'Driscoll £10,000 £520,000
David Wales £10,000 £520,000
Simon Harland £5,000 £260,000
Kieran Hunt £5,000 £260,000
Darren Page £5,000 £260,000
Vic Akers £5,000 £260,000
Paul Akers £5,000 £260,000
Paul Johnson £5,000 £260,000
Tony Roberts £5,000 £260,000
Marcus Svensson £5,000 £260,000
Danny Flitter £5,000 £260,000
James Collins £5,000 £260,000
Ben Knapper £5,000 £260,000
Steve Bould £20,000 £1,040,000
Liam Brady £20,000 £1,040,000
David Court £5,000 £260,000
Roy Massey £5,000 £260,000
Steve Gatting £5,000 £260,000
Lee Smelt £5,000 £260,000
Carl Laraman £5,000 £260,000
Steve Leonard £5,000 £260,000
Craig Gant £5,000 £260,000
Dennis Rockall £5,000 £260,000
Richard Goddard £5,000 £260,000
Alastair Thrush £5,000 £260,000
Stanley Kroenke £25,000 £1,300,000
Ivan Gazidis £18,000 £936,000
Peter Hill-Wood £1,500 £78,000
Ken Friar OBE £1,500 £78,000
Sir Chips Keswick £500 £26,000
Lord Harris of Peckham £500 £26,000
Wages £300,000 £15,600,000
Total £2,499,000 £129,948,000


My opinion is that the chief problem with the club has nothing to do with the amount of money spent, but rather who it's been spent on. The key word is, WASTAGE.

Take the following 15 players, all of which have completely failed to live up to expectations: Arshavin, Walcott, Almunia, Squillaci, Rosicky, Bendtner, Chamakh, Diaby, Denilson, Djourou, Fabianski, Traore, Park, Gibbs, Mannone. 

Add up the wage expenditure of that lot from between the 1-5 years of their employment at Arsenal and you will find £184,000,000 has been thrown down the toilet and another £46,300,000 blown on transfer fees. Have they really been worth £230,300,000 of your money dear Gooner?

Club denying Wenger funds? Or is it ALL down to Wenger losing the plot and paying silly money/ludicrous wages for his ego trip - better know as "project youth" - and average players imbibed with bad tactics that he can no longer motivate or improve? 


Insults directed at the site author or any other contributor will result in you being blocked from accessing this website indefinitely.


Kroenke speaks at last

The Telegraph newspaper has published an interview with Stan Kroenke, proving that Arsenal FC keep their ears close to the ground when it comes to what the media and bloggers are writing.

The complaint was that Silent Stan is too silent, so a newspaper reporter was picked by the club and sent to St Louis, Missouri for a PR exercise with the Arsenal owner. 

So what did the man with a moustache like a privet hedge have to say for himself? Well, he likes Arsene - he likes him very much. He loves the way Arsene "handles himself" and apparently Wenger is so good at talking he should "hold seminars".

Stan gave the impression that Wenger will never be sacked, and that he, and he alone, will decide when to vacate his position as manager of the club; but I wouldn't read too much into that. When it comes to the future of football managers, owners have to hold very black and white opinions. Either you back the manager or your don't, you cant have one leg in or one leg out, as that would only serve to undermine the manager's position, increase pressure and create further speculation.

That's why managers often get sacked two weeks after the board have given them the dreaded "vote of confidence". It's not because the board is in the habit of backstabbing, but because if they're not quite ready to sack a manager, they still have to show 100% support - even if privately their support is 20%.

Although, on the surface, a lot of what Kroenke spoke of in his interview made sense and seems perfectly reasonable, it also demonstrated an element of subterfuge. His comments on the club being self-sustainable for example can, on the one hand, be lauded as commendable, but - by the same token - out of touch, ambitionless or quite simply the actions of a private investor protecting his profit margin.

Investment - and the inevitable debt that comes with it - are part and parcel of any business with an ambition to succeed. There's nothing wrong with debt; it only becomes a problem when you become addicted to it or overstretch your capacity to pay it back.

Arsenal is the 5th richest club in world football, with a highly manageable and ever-receding debt - they're nowhere near overstretched and there's simply no excuse for the mess the club is in on the footballing side; a paltry 4 wins from 17 league games, the leaking of big players every single year, raised ticket prices to stupidly expensive levels, cheapo purchases and the horrendous mismanagement of wages that has left us unable to pay top whack for top players on a par with Everton let alone Man City.

Quite simply, supporters are being conned and Arsenal is failing because they have a selfish, egotistical, parsimonious, duplicitous, self-serving, tactical imbecile in charge who has been give carte blanche control of every aspect of the club and has made a complete mess of it.

A few other comments from Kroenke should also be taken with a pinch of salt, such as his reasurrances regarding engaging with fan groups to "protect the club", even though earlier this season he made clear strides to disenfranchise those very same supporter groups by trying to convince them to sell all their shares to him leaving them vocally redundant.

My biggest concern is that Kroenke - and his pet monkey Gazidis - simply don't understand football. They don't understand the culture, are not in touch with the supporters - on any level, and haven't a clue about whether Wenger's signings, training ground methods or tactics are practical, efficient or workable. They simply don't live in a footballing reality.

For Kroenke, Arsenal is an investors toy, and as we have now seen countless times Gazidis is a reactor not a proactor. He provides accountancy and marketing in an industry where the rules are not like any other business, but require a flexibility and unique cultural understanding of the sport itself. All he's done is spend the last two years re-arranging the deckchairs on the Titanic.

And so, for now, Wenger remains in control of the club from top to bottom, although at least Kroenke put one theory to bed by explaining that in all his time as the main shareholder of the club Wenger has never been denied "one dime". All transfer signings are down to Wenger, even the decision to sell Nasri was apparently left to Wenger - so there's absolutely nobody to blame for the state we're in except Arsene Wenger. Nobody!

Meanwhile, the last Arsenal game I watched was the Man Utd debacle; all the other games I have found something better to do with my time. I have, however, watched highlights and read broadsheet match reports of all the games - except Wednesday's game against Olympiacos.

On Wednesday I didn't even bother to watch Arsenal on a stream, instead I watched Valencia vs Chelsea on ITV. This month I will watch Spurs away (Sunday) and Chelsea away (29th) - these are the only Arsenal games worth watching as they are the only games that will tell me whether Wenger's madness is receding or we'll continual to fail ad nauseam.

I won't be supporting Arsenal in the traditional sense because my support of Arsenal is indefinitely suspended until Wenger is sacked or walks.

Arsenal Truth has more been about my life as an Arsenal supporter; taking as honest and impartial a view as possible. I'm not one for writing the same old drivel every day, sitting on the fence, dressing up situations favourably or unfavourably or disguising facts. I'm not in the bullshit game. I think straight and talk straight - and I expect people to be lucid and rational, even though football is a highly emotive sport.

While I can understand the emotion of matchday and the insane ramblings that come post-match when one is in a heightened state of either grief or euphoria, I simply can't sympathise with the supporter that continues to ignore what's staring them in the face 24 hours later; when all emotion has subsided.

There's always time to be fun and flippant, but this is not the time. Arsenal is in a mess and a few poxy wins against dirge like Swansea, Bolton and Olympiacos do nothing to disguise the mess we're in. Those results won't stop Van Persie walking next summer and other top talent drip-feeding their way out of the club. Those matches are not the ones that will decide whether Arsenal finish 4th or 10th - they're bread and butter wins that practically any top-flight team would be expected to win at home, let alone a club of Arsenal's receding stature.

On Sunday is the North London derby, and I feel dead inside. I can't bring myself to WANT Tottenham to win just to hype up my anti-Wenger agenda, but I don't really care what the result is either. I'm more of an observer now and I'm certainly more interested in performances rather than results, because if you're team is not playing with confidence, quality, organisation or conviction you're clearly never going to achieve anything. Unfortunately, these are all faculties of which Arsenal remain severley depleted.

What's it like being an Arsenal supporter that doesn't care anymore? In all honesty, I feel a bit sad but also relieved. I can see clearly now that I wasn't enjoying supporting Arsenal, it was making me incredibly frustrated and angry. It's nothing to do with results and it's nothing to do with the players either. My disdain for all things Arsenal is uniquely identifiable to Arsene Wenger - and rather than hide my frustration by covering it all up with lies and excuses like practically all the other Arsenal blogs do, I had to stop, because the truth hurts and, unlike most, I've been forcing myself to face the real truth every day, every week for three years - and write about it.


Insults directed at the site author or any other contributor will result in you being blocked from accessing this website indefinitely.


Lady Nina shoots from the hip!

Since being treated like an object on the bottom of the Arsenal board's shoe, booted ex-director Lady Nina Bracewell-Smith has finally broke her silence via Twitter.

In a series of 'announcements' on the social networking platform', Bracewell-Smith says of the events resulting in her departure from the Arsenal board, "[they] couldn't handle a woman with power on the board. Felt insecure. Male chauvinism".

What, Peter Hill-Wood? Male chauvinist?

On the subject of David Dein, Bracewell-Smith delivers mixed messages, saying Dein was the "Root cause of all the troubles at AFC" before updating that opinion with "I stand corrected. Dein loves the club and although sometimes personalities fallout, his contribution at Arsenal has been immense."

In other Twitter posts, Bracewell-Smith alludes to being caught in the crossfire of the battle between the late Danny Fiszman and Dein, which resulted in the latter's sacking - and, ultimately, her own boardroom demise.

To cut a long story short, it appears that at one point Dein was plotting to add his shares to Stan Kroenke and further hoped to nefariously acquire Bracewell Smith's hefty 17% holding to help take control of the club - she grassed him up and the remainder of the board grouped together and kicked Dein out.

Despite conceding that Bracewell-Smith's heart was in the right place, Dein later cited her inexperience in dealing with boardroom politics as the overriding reason for her dobbing him in; an opinion which was later proved accurate. Half an hour after suffering the charade of being publicly re-elected as a board member during Arsenal's 2008 AGM, Hill-Wood told Bracewell-Smith she was no longer required as a member of the Arsenal board.

Why? Because according to Hill-Wood, Bracewell-Smith was "not very easy to deal with" and becoming too cosy with Alisher Usmanov's Red & White Holdings - an excuse dreamed up after she was apparently seen, during one particular game, chatting in the Red & White Holding's director box at half-time.

Having denied any wrongdoing and initially resisting the board's wishes to resign, Bracewell-Smith quit within a fortnight having effectively been forced out. It was obvious that the board felt Bracewell-Smith's influence as a shareholder and non-executive director was seen as some sort of obstacle to their future dealings with Stan Kroenke. I don't know, maybe they presumed she'd kick up a fuss when they eventually conveyed their decision to make a mint for themselves by flogging all their shares to him.

Hypocritically, Hill-Wood claimed that Bracewell-Smith was "not right as a director" before displaying his hurt and bemusement that Lady Nina did not accept his so-called olive branch of still being allowed into the directors' lounge on match days. Many might wonder exactly the same thing about Hill-Wood. After all, what difference between him and Bracewell-Smith? Both obtained their position on the board through transferral of family ownership, what does either of them know about running a football club?

Regardless, why Bracewell-Smith has decided that this is the time to lay into the Arsenal board is a mystery, maybe she's just bored.

Lady Nina's latest Twitter statement? "I agree that current board should all go. They are passe. Have nothing more to give to the club at all. In time we will need a more dynamic pro-active, younger board, and a good directional leadership."

On current evidence, can't disagree with any of that.


Insults directed at the site author or any other contributor will result in you being blocked from accessing this website indefinitely.